Counterexample to theorems of Cox and Fine
Joseph Y. Halpern
aaai 1996
To investigate whether deaf readers use phonological information during sentence comprehension, deaf and hearing college students performed a semantic acceptability task on tongue-twister and control sentences. Indicative of phonological coding, subjects' responses were influenced by the phonetic content of the sentences they were reading and by the phonetic content of a concurrent memory load task. That is, the subjects in both groups made more errors in their acceptability judgments when reading tongue-twister than when reading control sentences. In addition, subjects in both groups made more errors when the tongue-twister sentences and concurrent memory load numbers were phonetically similar than when they were phonetically dissimilar. These results support theories that assign phonological processes an important role in reading. © 1991.
Joseph Y. Halpern
aaai 1996
Saeel Sandeep Nachane, Ojas Gramopadhye, et al.
EMNLP 2024
John R. Kender, Rick Kjeldsen
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Xiaoxiao Guo, Shiyu Chang, et al.
AAAI 2019