Erik Altman, Jovan Blanusa, et al.
NeurIPS 2023
The differences between and appropriateness of branching versus linear time temporal logic for reasoning about concurrent programs are studied. These issues have been previously considered by Lamport. To facilitate a careful examination of these issues, a language, CTL*, in which a universal or existential path quantifier can prefix an arbitrary linear time assertion, is defined. The expressive power of a number of sublanguages is then compared. CTL* is also related to the logics MPL of Abrahamson and PL of Harel, Kozen, and Parikh. The paper concludes with a comparison of the utility of branching and linear time temporal logics. © 1986, ACM. All rights reserved.
Erik Altman, Jovan Blanusa, et al.
NeurIPS 2023
Yehuda Naveli, Michal Rimon, et al.
AAAI/IAAI 2006
Kellen Cheng, Anna Lisa Gentile, et al.
EMNLP 2024
Xiaoxiao Guo, Shiyu Chang, et al.
AAAI 2019