Thomas Zimmerman, Neha Sharma, et al.
IJERPH
Although a plethora of research articles on AI methods on COVID-19 medical imaging are published, their clinical value remains unclear. We conducted the largest systematic review of the literature addressing the utility of AI in imaging for COVID-19 patient care. By keyword searches on PubMed and preprint servers throughout 2020, we identified 463 manuscripts and performed a systematic meta-analysis to assess their technical merit and clinical relevance. Our analysis evidences a significant disparity between clinical and AI communities, in the focus on both imaging modalities (AI experts neglected CT and ultrasound, favoring X-ray) and performed tasks (71.9% of AI papers centered on diagnosis). The vast majority of manuscripts were found to be deficient regarding potential use in clinical practice, but 2.7% (n = 12) publications were assigned a high maturity level and are summarized in greater detail. We provide an itemized discussion of the challenges in developing clinically relevant AI solutions with recommendations and remedies.
Thomas Zimmerman, Neha Sharma, et al.
IJERPH
Sailesh Conjeti, Amin Katouzian, et al.
Medical Image Analysis
Ismail Haritaoglu, Myron Flickner, et al.
VSTIA 2013
Ting Chen, Ritwik Kumar, et al.
ISBI 2013