J.V. Harzer, B. Hillebrands, et al.
Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials
Hysteresis loops taken at a surface are often found to change even when the probing depth of the magnetic measurement varies by only a few lattice spacings. We report an interpretation of these changes in the framework of a simple model which assumes that only one sheet of thickness d at the surface is magnetically different from the bulk. The model reproduces the experimental hysteresis loops with a variety of materials. One obtains the magnetic anisotropy Ks of the surface and the exchange stiffness A1,2 along a path perpendicular to the surface. For Fe(100), Ks and A1,2 are found to be very small; furthermore, the average easy direction of the surface magnetization is at approximately 75°to the one in the bulk. © 1988 The American Physical Society.
J.V. Harzer, B. Hillebrands, et al.
Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials
J. Paraszczak, J.M. Shaw, et al.
Micro and Nano Engineering
Zelek S. Herman, Robert F. Kirchner, et al.
Inorganic Chemistry
Min Yang, Jeremy Schaub, et al.
Technical Digest-International Electron Devices Meeting