Matthew Arnold, Stephen Fink, et al.
ACM SIGPLAN Notices
This paper describes an empirical comparison of the effectiveness of six context-insensitive pointer analysis algorithms that use varying degrees of flow-sensitivity. Four of the algorithms are flow-insensitive, one is flow-sensitive, and another is flow-insensitive, but uses precomputed flow-sensitive information. The effectiveness of each analysis is quantified in terms of compile-time efficiency and precision. Efficiency is reported by measuring CPU time and memory consumption of each analysis. Precision is reported by measuring the computed solutions at the program points where a pointer is dereferenced. The results of this paper will help implementors determine which pointer analysis is appropriate for their application.
Matthew Arnold, Stephen Fink, et al.
ACM SIGPLAN Notices
Michael Hind, Anthony Pioli
TOOLS 2000
Dries Buytaert, Andy Georges, et al.
OOPSLA 2007
Michael Hind
ACM SIGPLAN Notices