Xinyi Su, Guangyu He, et al.
Dianli Xitong Zidonghua/Automation of Electric Power Systems
This article studies how a mechanism designer can influence games by promising payments to the players depending on their mutual choice of strategies. First, we investigate the cost of implementing a desirable behavior and present algorithms to compute this cost. Whereas a mechanism designer can decide efficiently whether strategy profiles can be implemented at no cost at all our complexity analysis indicates that computing an optimal implementation is generally NP-hard. Second, we introduce and analyze the concept of leverage in a game. The leverage captures the benefits that a benevolent or a malicious mechanism designer can achieve by implementing a certain strategy profile region within economic reason, i.e., by taking the implementation cost into account. Mechanism designers can often manipulate games and change the social welfare by a larger extent than the amount of money invested. Unfortunately, computing the leverage turns out to be intractable as well in the general case. © 2011 World Scientific Publishing Company.
Xinyi Su, Guangyu He, et al.
Dianli Xitong Zidonghua/Automation of Electric Power Systems
Thomas M. Cover
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory
Eric Price, David P. Woodruff
FOCS 2011
Liat Ein-Dor, Y. Goldschmidt, et al.
IBM J. Res. Dev