M.B. Small, R.M. Potemski
Proceedings of SPIE 1989
In cryptographic protocols it is often necessary to verify/certify the "tools" in use. This work demonstrates certain subtleties in treating a family of trapdoor permutations in this context, noting the necessity to "check" certain properties of these functions. The particular case we illustrate is that of noninteractive zero-knowledge. We point out that the elegant recent protocol of Feige, Lapidot, and Shamir for proving NP statements in noninteractive zero-knowledge requires an additional certification of the underlying trapdoor permutation, and suggest a method for certifying permutations which fills this gap. © 1996 International Association for Cryptologic Research.
M.B. Small, R.M. Potemski
Proceedings of SPIE 1989
Renu Tewari, Richard P. King, et al.
IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging 1996
Kafai Lai, Alan E. Rosenbluth, et al.
SPIE Advanced Lithography 2007
Amir Ali Ahmadi, Raphaël M. Jungers, et al.
SICON