QALD-3: Multilingual question answering over linked data
Elena Cabrio, Philipp Cimiano, et al.
CLEF 2013
We consider the following fundamental scheduling problem. The input to the problem consists of n jobs and k machines. Each of the jobs is associated with a release time, a deadline, a weight, and a processing time on each of the machines. The goal is to find a nonpreemptive schedule that maximizes the weight of jobs that meet their respective deadlines. We give constant factor approximation algorithms for four variants of the problem, depending on the type of the machines (identical vs. unrelated) and the weight of the jobs (identical vs. arbitrary). All these variants are known to be NP-hard, and the two variants involving unrelated machines are also MAX-SNP hard. The specific results obtained are as follows: • For identical job weights and unrelated machines: a greedy 2-approximation algorithm. • For identical job weights and k identical machines: the same greedy algorithm achieves a tight (1+1/k)k/(1+1/k)k-1 approximation factor. • For arbitrary job weights and a single machine: an LP formulation achieves a 2-approximation for polynomially bounded integral input and a 3-approximation for arbitrary input. For unrelated machines, the factors are 3 and 4, respectively. • For arbitrary job weights and k identical machines: the LP-based algorithm applied repeatedly achieves a (1+1/k)k/(1+1/k)k-1 approximation factor for polynomially bounded integral input and a (1+1/2k)k/(1+1/2k)k-1 approximation factor for arbitrary input. • For arbitrary job weights and unrelated machines: & combinatorial (3 + 2√2 ≈ 5.828)-approximation algorithm. © 2001 Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
Elena Cabrio, Philipp Cimiano, et al.
CLEF 2013
Inbal Ronen, Elad Shahar, et al.
SIGIR 2009
Victor Valls, Panagiotis Promponas, et al.
IEEE Communications Magazine
S.M. Sadjadi, S. Chen, et al.
TAPIA 2009